These Are the Most Dangerous Objectives of the World Economic Forum

The World Economic Forum is an annual conference where the world’s most powerful and wealthy individuals meet to discuss policy for the entire planet. According to the media, the annual meeting is an event where its members discuss topics such as global warming, wealth inequality, science and technology as well as other important issues. However, these individuals are non-elected and operate in a semi-secret manner to decide policy: which is then applied all over the world through different entities.

The WEF has a strong influence on the world’s democratic nations, and tries to legitimize its operations by inviting world leaders to attend and speak at the annual event. One only needs to look at the list of attendees at the meetings to see the organization's influence and control - household names in politics, business, media, politics, finance and science and technology are present at the WEF.

According to Klaus Schwab:

“I have to say, when I mention names, like Mrs. Merkel and even Vladimir Putin, and so on, they all have been Young Global Leaders of the World Economic Forum. But what we are very proud of now is the young generation, like Prime Minister Trudeau, the President of Argentina and so on."
"We penetrate the cabinets. So yesterday I was at a reception for Prime Minister Trudeau and I know that half of his cabinet, or even more than half of his cabinet, are actually Young Global Leaders of the World Economic Forum. (…) It’s true in Argentina and it’s true in France, with the President – a Young Global Leader.”

Over the years, the WEF has supported very dangerous and worrying ideas such as the lockdowns that were imposed on the world's population after the start of the pandemic. The draconian restrictions that were forced on the world's population led to an explosion in suicides; mental health problems; job losses; drug use; businesses going bust; bankruptices; and homelessness; and small and medium sized businesses were decimated while massive corporations such as Amazon increased their value on the stock market. Children were especially affected by the lockdowns and evidence is now being published that exposes the harmful effects on children.

The Royal Society Open Science journal published a study that found that a major effect of lockdowns on children was that they suffered from clinical depression; furthermore, a former SAGE advisor to the government, Prof. John Edmunds has publicly come out against lockdowns: which have had negative consequences that were not even taken into consideration when modeling. Now the Professor has had to distance himself from the entire narrative.

Johns Hopkins University has also produced a major study, which came to the conclusion that lockdowns all over the world have made even more of a detrimental and long-lasting impact on society than they have made in any other beneficial way. In the end, researchers have concluded that lockdowns “are ill-founded and should be rejected as a pandemic policy instrument.”

Now the Royal College of Speech and Language and Language therapists has proclaimed that children have suffered from gaps in their development; which could possibly widen over the coming years, as some skills were never learnt. The RCSLT has stated that under assessments, one in five children are below average and are not meeting accepted standards by two and a half years old - which means that thousands of children will need speech and language support.

Another report by OFSTED has come to the same conclusion: those children who were around adults that wore face masks for two years now have reduced speech and language abilities. The main reason for this development is that children have been unable to see mouth movements and facial expressions; therefore, these children have not been as willing to socialize with their friends as would have been previously expected.

In the United States, director of the Speech and Learning Institute Jaclyn Theek, has said that her clinic has received a 364% increase in requests from parents that want Speech and Language therapy for their babies and toddlers that are speech delayed. The director says that what she is seeing is very similar to what would otherwise be associated with autism.

Even though these restrictions have caused immense damage to countries throughout the world, the Economic Forum posted a video entitled: “Lockdowns are quietly improving cities around the world.”

After blatantly turning a blind eye to the human suffering as a consequence of lockdowns, the WEF viewed these lockdowns as a huge success for the world only because “carbon emissions were down 7% in 2020.”

In fact, the WEF sees the whole pandemic as an “opportunity” for a great reset. The organization sees not only an “opportunity” to change our own existence but to alter the world's entire framework, so that it can be in line with its principles: the WEF refers to this process as “the Great Reset,” and it has published another video on the topic:

When one tries to link the dots and understand why the WEF is pursuing these objectives, one will come to the conclusion that a global government will be created that will control all of humanity through technocracy, science, media, technology. And the WEF is influencing governments throughout the world in order to advance their agenda.

In a 2010 WEF report entitled “Global Redesign”, Schwab claims that an anti-democratic and “self-selected coalition of multinational corporations, governments (including through the UN system), and select civil society organizations,” is the best fit for a globalized world.

Schwab seems to think that national governments are not “the overwhelmingly dominant actors on the world stage” anymore, and that “the time has come for a new stakeholder paradigm of international governance”.

The WEF has also come out against free speech and it is pushing to censor and regulate the internet. Australian “eSafety commissioner” Julie Inman Grant has voiced support for the “recalibration of free speech” at the 2022 Davos meeting. In her speech, Grant called for censorship and even said that freedom of speech should be “recalibrated” noting “online violence” as the pretext.

Julie Inman Grant stated:

“We are finding ourselves in a place where we have increasing polarization everywhere and everything feels binary when it doesn’t need to be. So I think we’re going to have to think about a recalibration of a whole range of human rights that are playing out online. You know, from freedom of speech to the freedom to be free from online violence.”

The WEF has also come out against the concept of ownership and has announced the “death of capitalism” by intervening in the system to “get the right people at the right place at the right time”, who would support its agenda. Not only that, but the WEF envisages a world where there are no products that people can own; people can only rent “services” that are delivered by drones.

According to an article posted on the WEF’s website:

Danish MP Ida Auken wrote: “I don’t own anything. I don’t own a car. I don’t own a house. I don’t own any appliances or any clothes.”

The president of the Alibaba Group J. Michael Evans publicly announced the development of an “individual carbon tracker” at the 2022 WEF event - yet again the WEF is using the environment as an excuse to control human development and behavior. According to the president of Alibaba, the tracker could monitor “where they’re traveling, how they’re traveling, what they're eating and what they are consuming on the platform”.

At the same event, Pekka Lundmark, who is the CEO of Nokia, stated that: “smartphones will be implanted directly into the body” by 2030.

The WEF also wants to implant chips into clothing - and the organization has published a video on the topic.

Yet again the WEF has used the environment as the main pretext to push for “digital passports” for clothing: which can be traced at any time and the WEF says that these “digital passports” will be introduced by 2025.

At the WEF’s event back in 2018, the CEO of Pfizer Albert Bourla made a speech about pills that contain microchips.

Albert Bourla states that:

“FDA approved the first ‘electronic pill’, if I can call it that. It is basically a biological chip that is in the tablet and, once you take the tablet, and it dissolves into your stomach, it sends a signal that you took the tablet. So imagine the applications of that, the compliance. The insurance companies would know that the medicines that patients should take, they do take them. It is fascinating what happens in this field.”